9/12 To be on the safe side, perhaps in addition to using tools/methods developed by @patrickmineault and @thewastebook, you should employ the cycle-by-cycle analysis introduced by @bradleyvoytek lab as well. (https://t.co/ZFgV39HIxl)
RT @JNeurophysiol: This excellent article was published in full this month. Authors developed "a fully documented, open-source Python packa…
RT @JNeurophysiol: This excellent article was published in full this month. Authors developed "a fully documented, open-source Python packa…
This excellent article was published in full this month. Authors developed "a fully documented, open-source Python package, bycycle, for analyzing neural oscillations on a cycle-by-cycle basis." https://t.co/J6tO6aDVsZ
RT @bradleyvoytek: 1/ New @JNeurophysiol paper! Thread. "Cycle-by-cycle analysis of neural oscillations" with @scottrcole. (This is update…
RT @nschawor: everything @scottrcole says! also the developed toolbox for characterizing waveform shape is super easy to use. I used a home…
Worth a read. Similar issues exist for rote fft analysis of nonsinusoidal quasi-impulsive acoustic and barometric oscillations.
Cycle-by-cycle analysis of neural oscillations | Journal of Neurophysiology https://t.co/JVNIP6rqY0
RT @stevenjluck: Great to see oscillation methods that don’t assume sine waves! When this assumption is wrong (and it often is), it can lea…
RT @APSPublications: Our most mentioned article last week is from @JNeurophysiol: Cycle-by-cycle analysis of neural oscillations https://…
RT @APSPublications: Our most mentioned article last week is from @JNeurophysiol: Cycle-by-cycle analysis of neural oscillations https://…
RT @APSPublications: Our most mentioned article last week is from @JNeurophysiol: Cycle-by-cycle analysis of neural oscillations https://…
RT @tobergmann: Important new methods paper from the Voytek lab on analyzing (non-sinusoidal) neuronal oscillations. https://t.co/0KrNBBhbxw
RT @APSPublications: Our most mentioned article last week is from @JNeurophysiol: Cycle-by-cycle analysis of neural oscillations https://…
RT @tobergmann: Important new methods paper from the Voytek lab on analyzing (non-sinusoidal) neuronal oscillations. https://t.co/0KrNBBhbxw
RT @tobergmann: Important new methods paper from the Voytek lab on analyzing (non-sinusoidal) neuronal oscillations. https://t.co/0KrNBBhbxw
RT @APSPublications: Our most mentioned article last week is from @JNeurophysiol: Cycle-by-cycle analysis of neural oscillations https://…
Our most mentioned article last week is from @JNeurophysiol: Cycle-by-cycle analysis of neural oscillations https://t.co/VD1sx6hy5M https://t.co/rvM8xSCbdp
RT @tobergmann: Important new methods paper from the Voytek lab on analyzing (non-sinusoidal) neuronal oscillations. https://t.co/0KrNBBhbxw
RT @tobergmann: Important new methods paper from the Voytek lab on analyzing (non-sinusoidal) neuronal oscillations. https://t.co/0KrNBBhbxw
RT @tobergmann: Important new methods paper from the Voytek lab on analyzing (non-sinusoidal) neuronal oscillations. https://t.co/0KrNBBhbxw
RT @tobergmann: Important new methods paper from the Voytek lab on analyzing (non-sinusoidal) neuronal oscillations. https://t.co/0KrNBBhbxw
RT @tobergmann: Important new methods paper from the Voytek lab on analyzing (non-sinusoidal) neuronal oscillations. https://t.co/0KrNBBhbxw
RT @stevenjluck: Great to see oscillation methods that don’t assume sine waves! When this assumption is wrong (and it often is), it can lea…
Important new methods paper from the Voytek lab on analyzing (non-sinusoidal) neuronal oscillations.
RT @stevenjluck: Great to see oscillation methods that don’t assume sine waves! When this assumption is wrong (and it often is), it can lea…
RT @stevenjluck: Great to see oscillation methods that don’t assume sine waves! When this assumption is wrong (and it often is), it can lea…
RT @stevenjluck: Great to see oscillation methods that don’t assume sine waves! When this assumption is wrong (and it often is), it can lea…
RT @stevenjluck: Great to see oscillation methods that don’t assume sine waves! When this assumption is wrong (and it often is), it can lea…
RT @stevenjluck: Great to see oscillation methods that don’t assume sine waves! When this assumption is wrong (and it often is), it can lea…
RT @stevenjluck: Great to see oscillation methods that don’t assume sine waves! When this assumption is wrong (and it often is), it can lea…
Great to see oscillation methods that don’t assume sine waves! When this assumption is wrong (and it often is), it can lead to bogus effects.
RT @TrikBek: I increasingly believe that these guys are doing science the right way. Thorough and clever, and open and sharing. And yes, os…
RT @TrikBek: I increasingly believe that these guys are doing science the right way. Thorough and clever, and open and sharing. And yes, os…
RT @TrikBek: I increasingly believe that these guys are doing science the right way. Thorough and clever, and open and sharing. And yes, os…
Non FFT based methods Heavily recommended
@luccwilsonn @prokraustinator
Because it's not good for neuroscience to report oscillations where they *do not* exist. Awesome!
I increasingly believe that these guys are doing science the right way. Thorough and clever, and open and sharing. And yes, oscillations are both overhyped and calculated funnily... Like blobs fMRI last decade.
everything @scottrcole says! also the developed toolbox for characterizing waveform shape is super easy to use. I used a home-grown solution before, but am a total convert.
step in a good direction! but I think that it won't stay as it doesn't address the cause of asymmetries and nonlinearities. I've tried to use chirp+Gabor combination but it creates too many unknown for my time :/ so go team Voytek! :)