↓ Skip to main content

American Physiological Society

Central pattern generators in the turtle spinal cord: selection among the forms of motor behaviors

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Central pattern generators in the turtle spinal cord: selection among the forms of motor behaviors
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, October 2017
DOI 10.1152/jn.00602.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul S G Stein

Abstract

Neuronal networks in the turtle spinal cord have considerable computational complexity even in the absence of connections with supraspinal structures. These networks contain Central Pattern Generators (CPGs) for each of several behaviors, including three forms of scratch, two forms of swim, and flexion reflex. Each behavior is activated by a specific set of cutaneous or electrical stimuli. The process of selection among behaviors within the spinal cord has multisecond memories of specific motor patterns. Some spinal cord interneurons are partially shared among several CPGs while other interneurons are active during only one type of behavior. Partial sharing is a proposed mechanism that contributes to the ability of the spinal cord to generate motor pattern blends with characteristics of multiple behaviors. Variations of motor patterns, termed deletions, assist in characterization of the organization of the pattern-generating components of CPGs. Single-neuron recordings during both normal and deletion motor patterns provide support for a CPG organizational structure with Unit Burst Generators (UBGs) whose members serve a direction of a specific degree of freedom of the hindlimb, e.g., the hip-flexor UBG, the hip-extensor UBG, the knee-flexor UBG, the knee-extensor UBG, etc. The classic half-center hypothesis that includes all the hindlimb flexors in a single flexor half-center and all the hindlimb extensors in a single extensor half-center lacks the organizational complexity to account for the motor patterns produced by turtle spinal CPGs. Thus, the turtle spinal cord is a valuable model system for studies of mechanisms responsible for selection and generation of motor behaviors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 23%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 7 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 9 35%
Engineering 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,966,514
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#1,828
of 8,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,468
of 338,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#27
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.