RT @KordingLab: @JCashaback @nidhi_s91 Modality is hugely important https://t.co/64phyTSDuK
@JCashaback @nidhi_s91 Modality is hugely important https://t.co/64phyTSDuK
RT @JNeurophysiol: This recent article from Cong Yin, Huijun Wang, Kunlin Wei, and @KordingLab was published in full this month. The findin…
RT @JNeurophysiol: This recent article from Cong Yin, Huijun Wang, Kunlin Wei, and @KordingLab was published in full this month. The findin…
RT @JNeurophysiol: This recent article from Cong Yin, Huijun Wang, Kunlin Wei, and @KordingLab was published in full this month. The findin…
Great paper. With the multi-sensory integration aspect (visual+proprioceptive), couldn't higher sensory uncertainty at the wrist compared to the finger tip, rather than higher motor noise, also explain the difference in prior's importance?
RT @JNeurophysiol: This recent article from Cong Yin, Huijun Wang, Kunlin Wei, and @KordingLab was published in full this month. The findin…
RT @JNeurophysiol: This recent article from Cong Yin, Huijun Wang, Kunlin Wei, and @KordingLab was published in full this month. The findin…
RT @JNeurophysiol: This recent article from Cong Yin, Huijun Wang, Kunlin Wei, and @KordingLab was published in full this month. The findin…
This recent article from Cong Yin, Huijun Wang, Kunlin Wei, and @KordingLab was published in full this month. The findings show that "the brain is not naively Bayesian with a single and veridical prior." "Sensorimotor priors are effector dependent" https
Very cool paper! Totally makes sense if you think that natural movement/pose stats shape our priors. Different effectors move differently... Thus different priors!
I always believed I was effector dependent. It’s nice to have that verified.
RT @KordingLab: Naive bayesian models are less general than is usually assumed. Priors appear to be effector dependent. Finally out. https:…
RT @KordingLab: Naive bayesian models are less general than is usually assumed. Priors appear to be effector dependent. Finally out. https:…
RT @KordingLab: Naive bayesian models are less general than is usually assumed. Priors appear to be effector dependent. Finally out. https:…
“The brain is not naively Bayesian with a single and veridical prior.” I like the sound of it
RT @KordingLab: Naive bayesian models are less general than is usually assumed. Priors appear to be effector dependent. Finally out. https:…
RT @KordingLab: Naive bayesian models are less general than is usually assumed. Priors appear to be effector dependent. Finally out. https:…
RT @KordingLab: Naive bayesian models are less general than is usually assumed. Priors appear to be effector dependent. Finally out. https:…
RT @KordingLab: Naive bayesian models are less general than is usually assumed. Priors appear to be effector dependent. Finally out. https:…
Naive bayesian models are less general than is usually assumed. Priors appear to be effector dependent. Finally out. https://t.co/nTsvNKiasC
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @royesal: Sensorimotor priors are effector-dependent | Journal of Neurophysiology https://t.co/dlnrvAy1xe
RT @royesal: Sensorimotor priors are effector-dependent | Journal of Neurophysiology https://t.co/dlnrvAy1xe
Sensorimotor priors are effector-dependent | Journal of Neurophysiology https://t.co/dlnrvAy1xe
“in violation of simple Bayesian models, the importance of the prior differs across effectors. Subjects overly rely on their prior in the typical reaching case compared to the wrist case. The brain is not naively Bayesian with a single and veridical prior.
RT @leoschilbach: „The brain is not naively Bayesian“ https://t.co/GPITaxuLvt
Sensorimotor priors are effector-dependent https://t.co/41TcIMeXL8
RT @leoschilbach: „The brain is not naively Bayesian“ https://t.co/GPITaxuLvt
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
On the depth (or hierarchy) of embodied priors...
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @leoschilbach: „The brain is not naively Bayesian“ https://t.co/GPITaxuLvt
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @leoschilbach: „The brain is not naively Bayesian“ https://t.co/GPITaxuLvt
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @leoschilbach: „The brain is not naively Bayesian“ https://t.co/GPITaxuLvt
„The brain is not naively Bayesian“ https://t.co/GPITaxuLvt
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
Makes sense!
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
This looks definitely interesting!
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
Effector-dependent priors in sensorimotor integration:
"What is the nature of our priors?" A crucial question in the current popularity of predictive processing and Bayesian inference, and of course @KordingLab takes it upon him and his team to tackle the sensitive but central issue of their concrete groundin
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
RT @KordingLab: What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use t…
What is the nature of our priors? New work shows that the priors are not abstract but are attached to the effector we use to refer to them: https://t.co/1YTxWYBDHW
Sensorimotor priors are effector-dependent https://t.co/qRBsg1hwv6