↓ Skip to main content

American Physiological Society

Distributed force feedback in the spinal cord and the regulation of limb mechanics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, December 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Distributed force feedback in the spinal cord and the regulation of limb mechanics
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, December 2017
DOI 10.1152/jn.00216.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors

T Richard Nichols

Abstract

This review is an update on the role of force feedback from Golgi tendon organs in the regulation of limb mechanics during voluntary movement. Some current ideas about the role of force feedback are based on circuit motifs linking idealized systems of agonists, synergists and antagonistic muscles. Force feedback is widely distributed across the muscles of a limb and cannot be understood based on these circuit motifs. Muscle architecture similarly cannot be understood in terms of idealized systems. It is hypothesized that distributed force feedback better represents the complex mechanical interactions of muscles, including viscoelastic coupling and inertial coupling across joints and axes of rotation. Signals from Golgi tendon organs appear to represent the stresses in the musculosketal network born by muscle articulations, myofascial force transmission and inertial coupling. Together with the strains of muscle fascicles measured by length feedback from muscle spindle receptors, this integrated proprioceptive feedback represents the mechanical state of the musculoskeletal system. Within the spinal cord, force feedback has excitatory and inhibitory components that co-exist in various combinations based on motor task and integrated with length feedback at the pre-motoneuronal and motoneuronal levels. It is concluded that, in agreement with other investigators, that autogenic, excitatory force feedback contributes to propulsion and weight support. It is further concluded that coexistent inhibitory force feedback, together with length feedback, evolved to manage interjoint coordination in the face of destabilizing inertial forces and positive force feedback, as required by the accelerations and changing directions of both predator and prey.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 19%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 19 25%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 17 23%
Engineering 13 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Sports and Recreations 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#5,234
of 8,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,086
of 446,025 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#73
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,025 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.