↓ Skip to main content

American Physiological Society

Case Studies in Neuroscience: A dissociation of balance and posture demonstrated by camptocormia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, October 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Case Studies in Neuroscience: A dissociation of balance and posture demonstrated by camptocormia
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, October 2017
DOI 10.1152/jn.00582.2017
Pubmed ID
Authors

R. J. St George, V. S. Gurfinkel, J. Kraakevik, J. G. Nutt, F. B. Horak

Abstract

Upright stance in humans requires an intricate exchange between the neural mechanisms that control balance and those that control posture; however, the distinction between these control systems is hard to discern in healthy subjects. By studying balance and postural control of a participant with camptocormia - an involuntary flexion of the trunk during standing that resolves when supine - a divergence between balance and postural control was revealed. A kinematic and kinetic investigation of standing and walking showed a stereotyped flexion of the upper body by almost 80 degrees over a few minutes, and yet the participant's ability to control their center of mass within their base of support and to compensate for external perturbations remained intact. This unique case also revealed the involvement of automatic, tonic control of the paraspinal muscles during standing and the effects of attention. Although strength was reduced and MRI showed a reduction in muscle mass, there was sufficient strength to maintain an upright posture under voluntary control and when using geste antagoniste maneuvers or "sensory tricks" from visual, auditory and haptic biofeedback. Dual-tasks that either increased or decreased the attention given to postural alignment would decrease, or increase the postural flexion, respectively. The custom-made, 'twister' device that measured axial resistance to slow passive rotation revealed abnormalities in axial muscle tone distribution during standing. The results suggest that the disorder in this case was due to a disruption in the automatic, tonic drive to the postural muscles and myogenic changes were secondary.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 26 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 10 14%
Sports and Recreations 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 27 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2018.
All research outputs
#19,951,180
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#5,871
of 8,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,657
of 331,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#74
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.