↓ Skip to main content

American Physiological Society

Low-threshold mechanoreceptors play a frequency-dependent dual role in subjective ratings of mechanical allodynia

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurophysiology, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Low-threshold mechanoreceptors play a frequency-dependent dual role in subjective ratings of mechanical allodynia
Published in
Journal of Neurophysiology, September 2017
DOI 10.1152/jn.00977.2016
Pubmed ID
Authors

Line S Löken, Eugene P Duff, Irene Tracey

Abstract

In the setting of injury, myelinated primary afferent fibers that normally signal light touch, are thought to switch modality and instead signal pain. In the absence of injury, touch is perceived as more intense when firing rates of Aβ afferents increase. However, it is not known if varying the firing rates of Aβ afferents have any consequence to perception of dynamic mechanical allodynia (DMA). We hypothesized that, in the setting of injury, the unpleasantness of DMA would be intensified as the firing rates of Aβ afferents increase. Using a stimulus-response protocol established in normal skin, where increased brush velocity results in an increase of Aβ afferent firing rates, we tested if brush velocity modulated the unpleasantness of capsaicin-induced DMA. We analyzed how changes in estimated mechanoreceptor firing activity influenced perception and brain activity (fMRI) of DMA. Brushing on normal skin was perceived as pleasant, but brushing on sensitized skin produced both painful and pleasant sensations. Surprisingly, there was an inverse relationship between Aβ firing rates and unpleasantness, such that brush stimuli that produced low firing rates were most painful and those that elicited high firing rates were rated as pleasant. Concurrently, we found increased cortical activity in response to low Aβ firing rates in regions previously implicated in pain processing while brushing sensitized skin. We suggest that Aβ signals do not merely switch modality to signal pain during injury. Instead, they exert a high and low frequency-dependent dual role in the injured state, with respectively both pleasant and unpleasant consequences.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Student > Master 6 13%
Other 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Engineering 4 8%
Psychology 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2017.
All research outputs
#16,725,651
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurophysiology
#4,998
of 8,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,654
of 328,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurophysiology
#59
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.